Stephen’s Posterous

Karl Rove, the former senior adviser and deputy chief of staff to President George W. Bush, believes that President Obama should be sheered for sending an additional 30,000 troops to Afghanistan. Gen. Stanley McChrystal, the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan, said he could use as many as 40,000 troops.

Mr. Obama hopes NATO can make up the difference between troops.

Mr. Obama also announced he would begin withdrawing the surge troops in 18 months, which Mr. Rove believes that this arbitrary date may embolden our enemies and raise questions about our commitment to the war.

Mr. Obama did match the surge with a reaffirmation of the comprehensive counterinsurgency plan he announced March 27, 2009.

Mr. Obama's Tuesday's speech should improve Mr. Obama's standing at home. The American people seem to accept Mr. Obama's action. In late November, 47% told Gallup they supported a troop increase in Afghanistan, while only 39% backed a reduction. This was up from 42% in favor and 44% opposed about two weeks earlier.

Unleashing his military and national security team to swarm Congress and TV talk shows will help his case. But the Democratic Party's antiwar faction is upset over the president's decision. Mr. Rove says that the antiwar left has little power to stop the president from making good on his commitments.

The White House can win a battle over war funding by standing with a coalition of victory-centered Republicans and Democrats who don't want their president embarrassed.

Mr. Rove believes victory can still be won, but it won't be quick or easy, and it will take active leadership from Mr. Obama.

Source.

Karl Rove, former senior adviser and deputy chief of staff to President George W. Bush, says that the elections on November 3, should scare Democrats.

President Obama was said to have redrawn the electoral map by winning Virginia last year with 53% of the vote. However, on November 3, Republican Bob McDonnell flipped the state back to the GOP.

Mr. Obama carried New Jersey easily last year with 57% of the vote, but on November 3, Republican Chris Christie ousted Democratic Gov. Jon Corzine.

Mr. Obama carried Pennsylvania last year by 10 points, but on November 3, Republican Judge Joan Orie Melvin was elected to the state's Supreme Court. The trend is that suburban and independent voters moved into the GOP column.

A 5-point swing in 2010 could bring a big wave of change. Democrats currently have 60 votes in the Senate, and Republicans 40. With a 5-point swing away from Democrats last fall, the party would have started this year with 54 seats and the Republicans 46.

A 5-point shift in 2006 would have left the GOP in control of the House. In 2008, a five-point shift would have produced a Democratic loss of six House seats rather than a gain of 21.

The bad news for Democrats is that the legislation that helped lead to the collapse of support for their party on election day may inflict more pain on those foolish enough to support it as the health-care bill House Speaker Nancy Pelosi wants to vote on this week could sink an entire fleet of Democratic boats in 2010.

The bill is more expensive than advertised. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) pegs its cost at $1.055 trillion over 10 years, not the $894 billion Mrs. Pelosi claims.

In the House bill there is a $2 billion tax on those who already have health insurance, $20 billion in taxes on medical devices, $8 billion in taxes on anyone who buys over-the-counter drugs with money from their health-savings accounts, and $140 billion in higher taxes on drugs.

Mrs. Pelosi's bill will drive up premiums. A family of four with an income of $78,000 would pay $13,800 for insurance a year by 2016, according to CBO.

The CBO estimates the public option will have higher premiums than private plans, even though it will get a $2 billion, interest-free start-up loan from the government. The bill dumps $34 billion onto already strained state budgets by pushing more of the working poor off private insurance and into Medicaid.

The election results for November 3, were the first sign that voters are revolting against runaway spending and government expansion.

Source.

Democratic enthusiasm for President Barack Obama's domestic agenda could wane after the results of the gubernatorial elections on November 3, 2009, in Virginia and New Jersey, according to Karl Rove, the former senior adviser and deputy chief of staff to President George W. Bush.

Republican victories in either state will tell Democrats in red states and red districts that support for Obama's policies is risky to their political health.

The more significant is the open race for governor in Virginia.

The Washington Post poll released on October 26, 2009, showed 55% support for Republican Attorney General Bob McDonnell and 44% for Democratic State Senator Creigh Deeds.

Reaction against Mr. Obama and his policies plays a smaller role in the New Jersey governor's race where voters are concerned with whether they should keep incumbent Democrat Jon Corzine.

Neither major party candidate in New Jersey has offered a compelling or comprehensive agenda. At times the independent candidate, Chris Daggett, has appeared the only contender with an agenda to rein in property taxes.

Two other elections on the November 3rd ballot have national implications: the New York Congressional District 23 special election and the Pennsylvania Supreme Court race.

The special election in New York's nominally Republican district 23 was brought about when the White House lured an otherwise unbeatable GOP Congressman, John McHugh, into giving up his seat to become Secretary of the Army.

The contest shows the danger of smoke-filled backrooms in the age of tea parties and town-hall angst. New York law says each party's 11 county chairmen in the district pick their candidate. The local GOP chieftains settled on Dede Scozzafava, a five-term liberal Republican state assemblywoman.

This led one of the disappointed nomination seekers, accountant Doug Hoffman, to mount a red meat campaign for the seat on the Conservative Party line.

With the GOP vote split, the lackluster Democrat standard-bearer, Bill Owens, is likely to win. If that happens, the combined vote of Ms. Scozzafava and Mr. Hoffman will signal what a GOP candidate chosen in a primary could get in the 2010 general election.

Finally, the Republican-endorsed candidate for Pennsylvania's Supreme Court, Judge Joan Orie Melvin, is mounting a strong effort against Democrat Jack Panella. A GOP victory would indicate trouble for Democrats in a state Mr. Obama carried by 10 points.

A year ago, Democrats crowed that Mr. Obama had reshaped the political landscape to their advantage. Voters have lived under Democratic rule for nine months, and many of them, especially independents, don't like what they're seeing.

The November 3, 2009, election will provide the most tangible evidence so far of how strong a backlash is building and just how frightened centrist Democrats should be of 2010.

Source.

Karl Rove, the former senior adviser and deputy chief of staff to President George W. Bush, questions President Obama's handling of Afghanistan.  

The Bush administration's strategic review was not released nor were its recommendations implemented by Obama's transition team. Instead, the review was handed over to the incoming president. Mr. Obama announced a "comprehensive new strategy for Afghanistan and Pakistan" on March 27.

Mr. Obama supported his new Afghan strategy by dispatching 21,000 additional troops. In June 2009, he named a new commander, Gen. Stanley McChrystal.

On Aug. 30, Gen. McChrystal warned in an assessment sent to the Pentagon that the war could be lost unless the U.S. sent more combat troops to the country. Mr. Obama did little about the general's assessment until it was leaked to the public.

The Obama administratiaon has made winning the war harder by mismanaging the U.S.'s relationship with the Afghan government.

Mr. Obama refused to take a call from Afghan President Hamid Karzai after his recent disputed election, as a confidante to Mr. Karzai told Mr. Rove.

The Afghan president was recently dismayed when political strategist James Carville, who has close ties to both Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel, became an adviser to Ashraf Ghani, who ran against Mr. Karzai.

Mr. Karzai took that as a sign that Mr. Obama was encouraging opposition to him. Mr. Karzai has now conceded that he didn't win his recent election and has agreed to a run-off.

Mr. Rove says that there is now politics in the Obama's war deliberations as the president's senior political adviser, David Axelrod, apparently attends war cabinet meetings. Mr. Rove never attended war cabinet meetings.

Mr. Obama's aides could be worried that by sending more troops to Afghanistan the White House will draw the fury of the left and lose support for its domestic agenda.

That fear is dangerous and unnecessary says Mr. Rove. The president can retain liberal support for liberal domestic initiatives regardless of the war. He can sustain support for the war by assembling a coalition of Democrats who want to win in Afghanistan, Democrats who would reluctantly follow their president and most Republicans.

It's vital that the president build this coalition because without decisive American leadership, international support for confronting terrorism will soon dissipate. The unraveling of Afghanistan and nuclear-armed Pakistan might not be far behind.

Source.

Karl Rove says that President Obama's problem is that his Magic Kingdom Health Care World is colliding with reality.

There is a big cost to any large government expansion and the ways to cover the cost of Mr. Obama's plan are limited, unpopular, and sure to anger Americans once they are fully understood.

Negotiations over the real health care bill can now begin according to Karl Rove, the former senior adviser and deputy chief of staff to President George W. Bush.

Democrats face a central problem for any governing party on how to pass a major piece of legislation when there are a lot of varying ideas about what should be in the bill.

Members of Congress will take a hard stand on a particular portion of a controversial bill. This allows them to show a little independence and make a plausible claim to have influenced the outcome.

The problem for Mr. Obama is that the Baucus bill is being sold on the strength of accounting tricks that make it appear that it won't add to the deficit.

If fiscally conservative Democrats sign on to the bill now after publicly saying they are doing so because it doesn't add to the deficit, they may end up bailing once the tricks are revealed to the public.

Mr. Rove says that one trick is that the bill imposes tax hikes and benefit cuts right away, including $121 billion of Medicare reductions between 2011 and 2015. New spending doesn't start until five years out and isn't fully operational until 2017. The bill uses 10 years worth of tax hikes and benefit cuts to fund a few years worth of benefits.

Mr. Rove points out that the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) released a report last week claiming the bill won't add to the deficit, but this assumes that employers who dump employee coverage under the Baucus bill will then increase worker paychecks by an amount equal to what they had spent on health care.

This replaces a nontaxable event with a taxable one magically producing $83 billion in revenues. Without this, the Baucus bill adds billions of dollars to the federal deficit in the first decade.

Under questioning at a Senate hearing Tuesday, CBO Director Douglas Elmendorf admitted that the $500 billion in tax hikes in the Baucus bill would be passed onto consumers, increasing insurance premiums.

Democrats who support any final bill are at risk. They will be held responsible for the mess when premiums rise, taxes balloon, deficits soar, mandates expand, and government power grows.

Mr. Rove says that the President who never stopped campaigning hasn't made the sale to Americans because he's forgotten a central rule of campaigning: Your arguments have to be clear and credible if voters are to believe them.

Mr. Obama's attempt to sell health care is neither. He still may win passage of a bill, but he's lost the public's enthusiastic backing.

Source.

Karl Rove, the former senior adviser and deputy chief of staff to President George W. Bush, says that the GOP is winning the health-care debate.

According to recent Fox News surveys, the number of independents who oppose health care reform reached 57% at the end of September 2009, up from 33% in July 2009. Independents are generally a quarter of the vote in off-year congressional elections.

Among college graduates, opposition to health care reform is now 50%, and only 33% support it, according to Gallup's September 24, poll. College graduates are slightly more than a quarter of the off-year electorate.

Among seniors, opposition to ObamaCare hit 63% in last month's Economist/YouGov Poll. Forty-seven percent of seniors said they strongly oppose health care reform, 27% strongly support it. Seniors will likely cast about 20% of the votes next year.

In 2006, the year the GOP lost control of Congress, Democrats enjoyed a double-digit lead in several generic ballot polls, a measure of voters' party preference. Democrats held that lead until 2009. Today, Gallup's generic ballot shows Democrats have a thin 46% to 44% edge. According to Gallop's numbers, independents now favor Republicans by nine points.

Congressional Democrats could also be the first to feel a backlash against rising federal spending. An early September 2009 Gallup poll found that 38% approve and 58% disapprove of Mr. Obama's handling of the deficit from 49% approve, 44% disapprove in March 2009.

In September 2009, a Fox News poll found that 61% of independents think the Obama administration wants to increase spending too much, 29% thought the amount of spending Mr. Obama wants is about right.

After a $787 billion stimulus package and other spending this year that have the administration planning to double the deficit in five years, many voters are worried about the amount of red ink being spilled.

President Obama's job approval rating appears to be stabilizing. The Rasmussen tracking poll for October 2-3, shows 46% of likely voters approve and 50% disapprove of his performance, unchanged over the past month.

This battle is far from over. Mr. Rove says that Democrats should keep in mind that there are two battles here, one for health care, and the other for keeping control of Congress. By fighting on health care, they may lose the second battle, keeping control of Congress.

Source.

President Barack Obama idea of going on five Sunday morning talk shows was a classic mistake according to Karl Rove, former senior adviser and deputy chief of staff to President George W. Bush.

A politician should not jump in front of a bunch of cameras without having something fresh to offer. Instead of showcasing Mr. Obama's passion, intelligence, and persuasive abilities, it put him on the defensive.

Mr. Rove says that health insurers have a 3.3% profit margin, which is less than the 4.6% average profit margin for all businesses in the U.S.

Drug companies enjoy an average of a 17% profit margin, but software companies average a 22% profit margin. With drug companies paying for ads favoring ObamaCare, it would be ironic if drug companies succeed at increasing their own taxes.

Mr. Rove says that Mr. Obama could look at other options like allowing Americans to buy insurance across state lines, permit small businesses to pool risk to get the same discounts large employers receive, and focus on medical liability reform.

According to recent polls, Americans do not like ObamaCare. Mr. Obama's continuous talking about his plan is making him look boring and stale. This makes him less interesting, according to Mr. Rove

Mr. Obama does not need more television air time. He needs a new health care plan that comes from true bipartisan negotiation and compromise.

Mr. Obama is certainly capable of flooding the airwaves with his eloquence of words, but what he really needs is a message that wins the attention and support of Americans.

Source.

Karl Rove, the former senior adviser and deputy chief of staff to President George W. Bush, says that it is becoming clear that President Obama's speech did not rally voters and it failed to inspire Democrats to follow their president's lead.

A Gallup poll the week of September 14, 2009, found that 38% of Americans say their representative should vote for ObamaCare, but 40% want their member to vote against ObamaCare. The respective figures were 37% and 39% the day before Mr. Obama spoke.

Mr. Rove believes that Mr. Obama's issue is his language; his speech did not have new information and his tone was not presidential. Mr. Obama did not bind Americans, but called legitimate concerns misinformation, false, and tall tales.

Mr. Obama had said earlier that some concerns brought up by people were lies. For example, Mr. Obama said that illegal aliens would not receive free health care, but after the speech, the White House announced that proof of citizenship would be required to enroll in the president's health plan.

The political landscape can change when the pool of people who vote changes. In 2008, five million more people voted than in 2004 when Mr. Obama drew two million more African-Americans to the polls.

Mr. Obama also had more younger voters at the polls, those aged 18-24, who supported Democrats by 66% to 32% for Republican, compared prior to 54% Democratic, and 45% Republican.

Mr. Obama's approval among young voters is down 10 points since July 2009, according to Gallup polls. This may drop more when younger voters find out that they could be fined up to $950 for not being insured.

Mr. Obama's health care plan starts running annual deficits in its third year, accumulates $219 billion in its first decade, and could add $1 trillion to the debt in its second decade.

The recent grassroots rally against ObamaCare in Washington was a sign that voters are getting active to oppose the president's agenda. Mr. Obama will appear on five news shows on Sunday, September 19, hoping to get more support for ObamaCare.

Source.

Karl Rove, the former senior adviser and deputy chief of staff to President George W. Bush, says that more time needs to be spent in crafting the best consensus policy with bipatisanship for a solution to health care. House Democrats should not push through legislation, which was done with the cap and trade bill now stalled in the Senate.

At the moment, with Ted Kennedy's senate seat open and Robert Byrdnot being able to attend and vote, there are not enough Senate Democrats to invoke cloture.

Mr. Rove says it is riskier to be at odds with American opinions rather than stand by as an unpopular proposal loses steam. Americans are increasingly concerned that a takeover of health care will spend too much money, create too much debt, and give Washington too much power.

Mr. Rove says that the Obama Team is arguing that forcing a controversial health care bill is better than not passing anything. This is based on the death of HillaryCare in 1994, but Mr. Rove says that trying to pass HillaryCare was what brought down the Democratic Party.

At a Labor Day union picnic in Cincinnati, President Obama said his health critics were spreading lies and that opponents to health reforms wanted to not do anything. Mr. Rove says that this does not show a spirit of bipartisanship and doesn't create a foundation for dialogue.

Mr. Rove says that the greatist political risk for Democrats in among seniors. A July 2009 Gallop poll shows that this group were the least likely to believe that health care reform would improve medical care.

The latest Pew poll, August 20-27, found that 30% of seniors supported health-care reform while 54% were opposed. In July 2009, Pew showed 29% in favor and 48% opposed. Mr. Rove says that seniors make up a disproportionate share of the off-year vote.

Congressional Democrats will be under great pressure to stand with President Obama, but Mr. Rove says that the prospects of their own political future may affectr their actions.

Source.

Karl Rove, the former senior adviser and deputy chief of staff to President George W. Bush, believes that President Obama has been focusing on health care when Americans are more concerned with the economy and jobs.

Americans are also not buying ObamaCare and many believe that the plan comes with a huge price tag and concerns that they will loose their current coverage.

Health care providers believe they will be forced to a one size fits all scenario while seniors are worried about the cuts to Medicare and Medicare Advantage.

Nine out of 10 Americans state that they have coverage and are happy with it. Of the 46 million people uninsured, 9.7 million are not U.S. citizens, 17.6 million have incomes of more than $50,000, and 14 million qualify for Medicaid or other programs.