Stephen’s Posterous

Technology. Finance. Tidbits. 
Filed under

Venture Capital

 

Q&A with Harvard’s Josh Lerner

The Wall Street Journal blog Venture Capital Dispatch interviewed Josh Lerner, a professor at Harvard Business School and a well-known voice in the venture capital industry. Mr. Lerner has signed on as a senior advisor to fund of funds manager Grove Street Advisors LLC.

When asked about the topic of his upcoming book, which addresses the public efforts to boost entrepreneurship and venture capital, Mr. Lerner said that the financial crisis has opened the door to massive public interventions in the West.

Many nations and their governments responded to the threats of illiquidity and insolvency by making huge investments in troubled firms by taking large ownership stakes. There are many concerns can be raised about these investments, from the rushed way in which they were designed by very few people behind closed doors to the design flaws that many experts think will limit their effectiveness.

But one question that should be asked Mr. Lerner says is shouldn't public funds also promote new enterprises and not just prop up troubled entities, especially when the venture industry is on life support, and troubled firms may be beyond salvation.

Silicon Valley, Singapore, and Tel Aviv all bear the marks of government investment, but for every successful public intervention spurring entrepreneurial activity, there are many failed efforts, wasting untold billions in taxpayer dollars.

When Mr. Lerner was asked what one or two changes would provide the biggest boost to venture capitalists, he responded:

There are two sets of changes that could make a big differences. The first is an evolutionary one, which is already underway. Not only have too many groups had mediocre returns for long periods of time, but they have undertaken a lot of "me too" investments that have made it hard for everyone to succeed.

We are now seeing that many second- and third-tier groups are having much greater difficulty raising new capital. While this is of course a frustrating turn of events from an individual perspective, from the point of view of the industry as a while, it cannot help but be seen as a healthy development.

The second relates to public policy. In too many areas, our system has made it hard to be an entrepreneur developing advanced technologies. From a patent system which has been overrun by sham litigation to the many barriers that public companies face, there are a whole variety of policies that create barriers to entrepreneurship.

We need to revisit many of the "reforms" of recent decades—from the strengthening of patent rights to Sarbanes-Oxley—and ask how they could be changed to minimize the harmful effects on entrepreneurs.

The impact of having more private equity and venture capital firms that will have to register as investment advisors with the Securities and Exchange Commission will promote some transparency and only impose a modest cost on the industry, Mr. Lerner says, but some of the proposals emendating from Brussels and Strasbourg, in which some members of the European Commission and Parliament are proposing to micro-manage investment decisions of private equity groups, are troubling.

When asked if private equity firms, including venture capital funds, pose systemic risks to the financial system, Mr. Lerner says that the topic is being researched under the umbrella of the World Economic Forum.

Source.

Filed under  //   Entrepreneurship   European Commission   Grove Street Advisors LLC   Harvard Business School   Josh Lerner   Private Equity   Sarbanes-Oxley   Securities and Exchange Commission   Venture Capital   World Economic Forum  

Comments [1]

Italian Start-Up beeTV Raises $8 Million

A Italian-based startup, beeTV, has raised $8 million in Series B funding from the Italian VC firm Innogest, according to TechCrunch.

BeeTV offers a way to change the way that we currently watch TV by using a Personal Content Channel (PPC), which is a personal TV suggestion engine that will suggest TV programs for you.

According to beeTV on its website, the white labeled PCC is designed to serve three screens: TV, mobile and PC. Providers have the option to integrate all three screen PCC's or choose a combination that fits their own marketing and distribution needs. In this way, beeTV delivers a powerful and modular solution that widens the reach of the operator's brand and creates valuable conversions in today's "on-the-go" devices.

TechCrunch writes:

To manage, control and share your online TV viewing experience, the company created a product called beeWeb, and it’s also bringing the PCC to mobile devices to enable always-on connectivity and the ability to interact with set-top boxes on the go.

It currently has an iPhone application in the works that will allow TV viewers to control their STBs, get recommendations for shows & movies that are relevant to them and available in their specific TV subscription, and also enable them to watch trailers and set their STBs to record or create notifications for the shows they would like to watch.

BeeTV is currently focusing on finalizing its 1.5 version and claims to be engaged with some of the leading TV providers in the world for trials that are expected to roll into their commercial phase by the end of 2009 and beginning of 2010.

BeeTV was founded in 2006 by an international team of experienced technology and media experts.

As stated on its website, Innogest is the leading Venture Capital firm in Italy founded by the Managing Partners Marco Pinciroli, previously with BC Partners, and Claudio Giuliano, previously with The Carlyle Group. With $120 million under management, offices in Milan, Padua and Torino, Innogest is the investor of choice of Italian entrepreneurs with global ambitions.

Filed under  //   BC Partners   beeTV   Carlyle Group   Claudio Giuliano   Innogest   iPhone   Marco Pinciroli   Personal Content Channel   PPC   TV   Venture Capital  

Comments [0]

Start-Up BrightScale Shuts Down

Wall Street Journal's Venture Capital Dispatch reported that BrightScale Inc, which made chips for video processing has shut down according to one of the company's primary investors.

Adams Capital Management joined some individual backers in 2003 to invest $6.2 million in BrightScale,which was formerly known as Connex Technology.

Bill Frezza, a general partner at Adams Capital Management who held a board seat at the company said that the firm had worked really hard on this investment in BrightScale.

Venture Capital Dispatch said that worldwide demand for video processing products remains high as they are necessary in a wide range of consumer electronics. However, building chips for vdeo is a highly competitive and expensive business. Consumer demand is also unpredictable.

Chips for flat screen televisions are expected to do more with less space while also handling high definition signals. The chips must be produced relatively quickly.

BrightScale’s chips was able to compress video so that it can be sent over the airwaves without hogging too much bandwidth, a feat that becomes more important as video finds its way to mobile devices.

BrightScale is based in Sunnyvale, California. On its website, it states that BrightScale was conceived in April of 2002 by an international team of engineers and scientists from academia and industry with established backgrounds in processor architecture, compiler design and digital video/still imaging.

BrightScale brings to market for the first time a fully programmable device that can compete directly with fixed function ASIC solutions, in terms of performance and cost. This value proposition provides the opportunity for BrightScale to build leading market share in the highly evolving and growing Digital Television and Multi-media market.

Filed under  //   Adams Capital Management   BrightScale Inc.   Chips   Connex Technology   Flat Screen Televisions   Imaging   Venture Capital   Video Processing  

Comments [0]

BlogHer Raises $7M as Solar Loses Luster

VentureBeat wrote that a website for women who blog called BlogHer has raised $7 million in a thrid or Series C round of financing. It seeks to be profitable in 2010. The company has raised $15.5 million so far according to AllThingsD. BlogHer was founded in 2005, has 30 employees, and has 14 million unique visitors a month.

According to AllThingsD, the new round includes a return by two existing investors, Venrock and Peacock Equity, a fund run by GE (GE) and its NBC Universal unit. Azure Capital is joins as a new investor.

VentureBeat wrote that there a number of other players are competing in this space like AOL Living, Real Girls Media Network, Glam, and Sugar. It also reported that BlogHer also allied with iVillage, a somewhat larger women-focused network. Both Real Girls Media Network and Glam have raised money recently to expand.

The website paidContent.org said that parenting site Babble raised $1.25 million on May 12, 2009, on top of $2 million raised in December 2009, and Glam Media raised $10 million in April in order to expand overseas.

The Financial Times reported in April that venture capital investment in the US has dropped to the lowest level since before the dotcom boom 10 years ago. The article said that the near collapse of the economy forced VCs to focus on existing companies in their portfolio rather than seek new opportunities, as exemplified by Series B and Series C funding.

The collapse in startup investment was particularly noticable in the green technology world ending a boom in the renewable energy and other energy-saving and environmental technologies. Wall Street Journal's Venture Capital Dispatch wrote on May 11, 2009, that the light may be dimming on the solar power industry. Read the full story.

Filed under  //   AOL Living   Azure Capital   Babble   BlogHer   Glam Media   Green Technology   Real Girls Media Network   Solar Power   Venrock and Peacock Equity   Venture Capital  

Comments [0]

Mobile Content Company Kadoink Shuts Doors

Turning Out the Lights: Kadoink by Scott Denne, WSJ.com

After failing to secure a second round of financing, Kadoink Inc., provider of a mobile content delivery and advertising platform, has discontinued its service as it continues to look for a buyer for its assets. The service was shut off last week, a move that followed Hercules Technology Growth Capital, its lender, taking possession of the company in mid-April, according to Scott Cahill, Kadoink’s chief executive.

Kadoink’s platform enables users to set up customized text alerts from publishers such as the Associated Press. The company brought in revenue by delivering pay per performance advertising alongside the content. It also recently launched a service to deliver ads from publishers who had their own content delivery platform.

Kadoink raised a $7 million Series A round in November 2007 from Sutter Hill Ventures and angel investors. The company had previously paid back a portion of its $2 million loan from Hercules Technology, and the venture debt firm has since taken some of the company’s cash to repay that amount, Cahill said. 

Cahill said an asset sale could bring in more money than is owed to Hercules, and therefore return some cash to the company’s equity investors. Several of the company’s partners and customers have expressed interest in purchasing the assets, he said. “The goal is to find a buyer for the assets and hopefully a home for some of the employees,” Cahill said. Kadoink has let go 14 of its 16 employees, he said.

With Sutter Hill agreeing to participate, the company was looking for a new investor to lead and price a round with a target between $5 million and $6 million. Kadoink’s inability to find such an investor was largely due to its restart, Cahill said.

In January 2008, many of Kadoink’s founders left the company due to a disagreement with the board over the company’s “strategy and management,” Cahill said, though he declined to give specifics about the disagreement. At that time Kadoink provided a service that enabled bands and recording companies to share music, text messages and other content via a mobile device.

It launched its latest product in November 2008 and had good traction, but since much of the Series A round had been spent on the previous strategy, the company didn’t have enough time to make the progress that investors wanted to see before a second round, Cahill said.

It also hurt Kadoink’s chances that its restart brought it into the mobile ad space at a time when that “nascent but growing” market is having some significant growing pains, Cahill said. “Mobile ads continue to grow, but at a slower pace than projected. Advertisers want to have a mobile play, but are still playing with the different formats,” he said.

Source.

Filed under  //   Hercules Technology Growth Capital   Kadoink Inc.   Scott Cahill   Sutter Hill Ventures   Venture Capital  

Comments [0]

Amazon.com Start-Up Investments Lose Value

Amazon.com Watches Start-Up Investment Portfolio Sink in Value by Tomio Geron, WSJ.com

Venture capital firms aren’t the only investors watching their start-up portfolios plummet in value. Amazon.com Inc. today showed how some large companies are facing the volatility that comes with investing in start-up companies.

Amazon.com disclosed in its 10-Q report that the value of its equity investments was $89 million as of March 31, down 64% from the $248 million reported just six months earlier.

“We review our investments for impairment when events and circumstances indicate that the decline in fair value of such assets below the carrying value is other-than-temporary. Our analysis includes review of recent operating results and trends, recent sales/acquisitions of the investee securities, and other publicly available data,” Amazon wrote in explaining the value.

“Impairment” is a nice way to describe what’s happening to start-ups as they raise new rounds of funding at lower valuations in today’s tough fund-raising environment. Amazon did have a stake in online payments company Bill Me Later Inc., which was acquired in November 2008 by eBay Inc. for $945 million, which could account for some decline in the value of its investments.

But Amazon still held stakes in a number of start-ups, including Yieldex Inc., a provider of advertising inventory management and forecasting technology, that raised an $8.5 million Series B round in February 2009 led by Amazon. In August 2008, Amazon co-led a $12 million Series B in Elastra Corp. a provider of software to manage applications hosted on Amazon’s Web platform.

Amazon has also invested in Engine Yard Inc., which helps companies host and manage Ruby on Rails applications and Talk Market Inc., a video shopping Web site.  More recently, the retailing giant seed invested in two companies, Foodista and Booktour, according to TechFlash.

Source.

Filed under  //   Amazon.com   Bill Me Later Inc.   Booktour   eBay   Elastra Corp.   Engine Yard Inc.   Foodista   Talk Market Inc   Venture Capital   Yieldex Inc  

Comments [0]

Pinkberry Secures $5.8M in New Funding

Investors Sweet On Frozen Yogurt Chain Pinkberry by Ty McMahan, WSJ.com

Pinkberry Inc., owner of the popular frozen yogurt chain, has indulged in its own springtime treat with a new round of venture capital funding.

Despite a sagging economy, venture capital investors in Pinkberry, as well as those in arch enemy Red Mango Inc., appear to remain enthusiastic about selling premium yogurt at an average of around $5 for a small serving with toppings.

A regulatory filing shows Pinkberry has secured $5.8 million of a round totaling $15 million. Chief Executive Ron Graves quickly confirmed on April 23, 2009, that the company has raised new funding, but was not available to provide further details.

It isn’t immediately clear which investors participated in the company’s most recent round. Venture capital firm Maveron, co-founded by Starbucks Coffee Co. Chairman Howard Schultz, backed Pinkberry in October 2007 with $27.5 million in funding.

Los Angeles-based Pinkberry, which owns 59 stores in California and two in New York, has managed to establish itself as a piece of pop culture, with its swirly dessert often seen toted by celebrities and featured in television programs like the popular “Gossip Girl.”

Some frozen yogurt fans suggest that Pinkberry closely resembles Red Mango, which first attracted venture capital dollars. Both have similar histories in that their type of sour-style yogurt was wildly popular in South Korea before opening stores in the U.S. and catching the eyes and taste buds of U.S. investors. 

Red Mango received a $12 million scoop of funding in August from Dallas-based investment firm CIC Partners and retail executive John Antioco. The company, which operates 48 stores in eight states according to its Web site, previously raised about $4 million from Stone Canyon Venture Partners and individual investors. It recently announced an aggressive expansion program, with plans to open 550 locations across the U.S. over the next five years.

Source.

Filed under  //   CIC Partners   Howard Schultz   John Antioco   Mavero   Pinkberry   Red Mango Inc.   Ron Graves   South Korea   Starbucks Coffee Co.   Stone Canyon Venture Partners   Venture Capital   Yogurt  

Comments [1]

VC's Press Congress To Reauthorize SBIR Program

Venture Industry Presses Congress to Reauthorize SBIT Program byTomio Geron, WSJ.com

With a deadline fast approaching, the venture capital industry continues to push for a change in the way the Small Business Innovation Research program is administered to allow the participation of venture-backed companies.

Josh Green, a general partner at MDV-Mohr Davidow Ventures, and three entrepreneurs were in Washington on Aparil 22, 2009, to testify in front of the House Committee on Small Business about the need to reauthorize the SBIR the program, which is set to expire at the end of July 2009.

A 2001 administrative law judge ruling, and subsequent rulings by the U.S. Small Business Administration, closed the program to many venture-backed companies.

The principal reason: SBA has interpreted the law to mean that start-ups majority-owned by venture firms must count the employees of the firms’ other companies. As a result, venture-funded companies petitioning federal agencies that issue SBIR grants, such as the U.S. Department of Defense and the National Institutes of Health, have in many cases been judged to have more than 500 employees.

The National Venture Capital Association has opposed this interpretation, arguing that venture firms aren’t involved in the day-to-day operations of portfolio companies, and that most venture-backed businesses are small, typically employing fewer than 25 people.

“Companies receiving venture funding may have other innovation in the pipeline worth pursuing,” Green told the committee on Aparil 23. ”It’s for these projects that companies would apply for SBIR grants. Businesses must continue to innovate and the current SBA interpretation forces companies into an uncomfortable dilemma for worthy new projects. This scenario results in small businesses at best delaying important discovery projects and at worst abandoning this important work altogether.”

Rep. Nydia Velazquez, chair of the committee, asked Rachel King, chief executive of venture-backed GlycoMimetics Inc. whether her company would be able to develop new research through SBIR grants that it could not otherwise.

“Absolutely. We have a family of compounds that could be useful in a number of infectious diseases, such as HIV and tuberculosis,” King said. “We can’t focus on that program because we have to focus on our lead program. If we were able to access that funding source then we and other companies would be able to invest in more early stage, very promising research than we can now.”

Will Rosellini, chief executive of medical-device company MicroTransponder Inc., said venture capitalists are only interested in having his company focus on one indication, chronic pain. But he believes that by tapping SBIR funds the company could help develop the device for four other indications.

“We’ve mobilized other neuroscientists to use our device in different ways, and the way that we’ve motivated them is by saying, ‘Hey, go after these SBIR funds,’ so we can come up with further innovation in a non-dilutive way for other disease indications….If we didn’t have that opportunity, all of these innovations would have stopped.”

Those testifying also drove home the point that many venture-backed companies employ only a few people, yet the program in its current form hands out grants to larger corporations with hundreds of employees and tens of millions of dollars in revenue.

In his testimony, Green attempted to debunk an argument by some critics who say that venture-backed companies would crowd out other small businesses with SBIR funding. Green cited a recent National Academy of Sciences study that found that no other small businesses have been significantly affected by venture-backed businesses due to SBIR funding.

Green, in a telephone interview after the hearing on April 22, said he received a relatively positive reaction to his testimony.

“I was surprised there was absolutely not a single dissenting voice among members or staffs in terms of expanding the program to venture-backed entities.” Green said. “My understanding is there is some opposition out there but it was completely not visible to me today.”

The testimony from April 22, 2009, is viewable on YouTube, broken up into 25 videos.

Source.

Filed under  //   GlycoMimetics Inc.   Josh Green   MDV-Mohr Davidow Ventures   MicroTransponder Inc.   National Institutes of Health   National Venture Capital Association   Nydia Velazquez   Rachel King   SBA   SBIT Program   Small Business Innovation Research   U.S. Department of Defense   U.S. Small Business Administration   Venture Capital   Will Rosellini  

Comments [0]

Weekend Interview with Twitter's Williams and Stone

The Twitter Revolution by Michael S. Malone, WSJ.com

"Twitter is the side project that took," says company co-founder Biz Stone, 35. "Now it's our chance to do something transformative."

When I arrive at Twitter's headquarters on a recent morning, Jerry Brown is waiting in the lobby, just another day at the world's hottest high-tech company. "It's pretty bizarre," says co-founder Evan Williams, 37. "At least once per day we look at each and say, 'What the hell?' It's like we're living out the script of the ultimate start-up company story."

But other than the familiar face of California's attorney general standing near the steel front door, you would hardly know that this little company of about 30 employees is the epicenter of the Web, used by an estimated 20 million Americans on a daily, even minute-by-minute, basis. Just how fast Twitter is growing is a company secret, but its traffic appears to be more than doubling every month.

The company itself seems calm and casual. The employees drift in, grab some free food and eventually make their way to their desks. It's located in an anonymous warehouse just a couple blocks from South Park, the once-frenzied environs of the dot-com companies of the first Internet boom.

In his sports shirt and slacks, sipping a bottle of apple juice, Mr. Williams exhibits indifference to the trappings of success. So does Mr. Stone, who last year won an Oxford Union debate wearing a borrowed bow tie and a pair of black sneakers.

The company is hiring like crazy, it expects to double its size in the next month or two, and is also adding a senior management, notably new vice-president of global operations Santosh Jayaram, hired away from Google. "We've never had a company that grew past 15 to 20 people," says Mr. Stone, "We're kind of excited about that."

Even faster than Google, Amazon and eBay in their days, the three-year-old Twitter has become deeply embedded in the culture. President Barack Obama twittered the words, "We just made history," on the night of his election. It was a twittered image that first captured the forced landing of US Airways Flight 1549 in the Hudson River.

Scores of people trapped in the Mumbai terrorist attack twittered desperately for help. And in a much discussed event, a San Francisco technology writer twittered his surprise to discover his home was being broken into.

Strictly speaking, Twitter is a social networking application that enables users to post short text messages,  called tweets, of no more than 140 characters on their personal feed. These real-time diary entries can then be read by other users, called "followers," who have subscribed to that page.

Twitter is much more than a novel way to share updates of one's daily life with friends. It's now evolved into a powerful new marketing and communications tool. Regional emergency preparedness organizations are looking at Twitter as a way to reach millions of people during a disaster.

NASA is using it to regularly update interested parties about the status of space shuttle flights. And one journalist solicited help from fellow Twitterers to get himself out of an Egyptian jail. It worked.

The real Twitter revolution may prove to be much more everyday. When I stop for a latte at Peet's Coffee on the way to the interview, the manager tells me that he plans to start sending out tweets to let regular customers know when a table is open. He isn't alone.

A Manhattan bakery twitters when warm cookies come out of the oven. "It's those small stories that really inspire us," says Mr. Stone. "Those are the things that transform people's lives."

Mr. Stone vividly remembers the first time he appreciated the power of Twitter. He and his now-wife had just bought a house in Berkeley and, having spent the day scraping up carpet and painting walls, he was tired and sweaty. "That's when I got a twitter from Evan saying, 'Up in Sonoma drinking pinot noir after a massage.' I just started laughing. That's when I realized that this technology could be entertaining too," as opposed to a basic communications tool, he says.

"It took us a while to figure out that it really was a big deal," says Mr. Williams. It was at the annual South by Southwest tech conference/music festival in Austin, Texas, in March 2008, that the social power of Twitter came home to the co-founders. "I found myself watching groups of people twittering each other to coordinate their actions, which bar to go to, which speech to attend, and it was like seeing a flock of birds in motion," says Mr. Stone.

As with many Web entrepreneurs, Messrs. Williams and Stone took unconventional paths to success.

Mr. Williams was born on a soybean, corn and cattle farm near Clarks, Neb., pop. 361, where he attended the single public school there. In a class of just 14, he took part in everything from sports to band. "In a school that small, everyone does it all," he says.

But he was an indifferent student and felt like a black sheep at home, too. His father and brother loved to farm and hunt, while Evan, a vegetarian, preferred to read and ponder schemes for building enterprises.

Eventually he made it to the University of Nebraska, but he never declared a major, took as few classes as possible, and eventually dropped out. In the years that followed, Mr. Williams drifted around the country, Key West, Dallas, Austin, working various technology jobs and trying to pursue start-ups.

But every time he got started on one idea, some new idea would pop into his head, luring him away and preventing him from ever following through on a project. "It was turning into a constant pattern," Mr. Williams recalls.

By 1996, Mr. Williams found himself back on the family farm, with little money and few prospects. "I was in the dumps," he recalls. He had long worshipped California's Silicon Valley from afar, and now, with nothing to lose, he decided to move there. "Unfortunately, my aim was a little off," he says, since he landed in the farming town of Sebastopol in Marin County, working for the old-guard media/conference firm O'Reilly Inc.

In the end, that proved fortuitous. What began as a marketing job ended up as an independent contractor job writing computer code, and in short order, Mr. Williams parlayed that into freelance work with legendary Valley companies like Intel and Hewlett-Packard. "For the first time, I learned what it was like to work in an office and have a normal career. To be in real meetings. I also learned that I didn't want to do that."

Did Mr. Williams ever feel that there was something wrong with his inability to hold a traditional job? "No," he says. "I always figured there was something wrong with everybody else."

In 1999, Mr. Williams teamed up with another contractor, Meg Hourihan, and founded Pyra Labs to make management software. A much admired product which allowed managers to handle complex projects online, Pyra earned him a reputation as a brilliant entrepreneur who didn't know how to make money.

"The truth is," Mr. Williams protests, "we had revenues from the first day . . . there just wasn't enough of them." It should have ended in yet another business failure -- but in computer parlance, Mr. Williams decided to 'turn a bug into a feature.' This meant taking one of his distracting brainstorms and turning it into a company.

The new company, called Blogger.com -- Mr. Williams invented the term -- which was developed from a note-taking application on Pyra, was the original blog prototype. It proved to be one of the few successes of the era. Better yet, Mr. Williams even managed to nail down some real venture investment just as the bubble burst.

Mr. Williams finally had a real company and real money. Now he needed a team.

Enter Christopher Isaac "Biz" Stone. Raised in Wellesley, Mass., Mr. Stone had an early love for graphic arts and theater. But at the University of Massachusetts, he too had proven to be a distracted student, and when a job at publisher Little, Brown evolved from moving boxes to designing book covers, Mr. Stone dropped out of college.

In the years that followed, he, like Mr. Williams, discovered a natural gift for Web design and programming. In fact, the two young men had admired each other's work from opposite coasts.

So when Evan invited Biz to join Blogger, Biz moved West. He arrived just in time to get the news that Google decided to acquire Blogger. Messrs. Williams and Mr. Stone, neither of whom technically qualified for the CV-obsessed company, were suddenly Google employees.

The gig lasted 20 months and both men say they thoroughly enjoyed it. Mr. Williams even met his future wife at the firm. But the entrepreneurship gene couldn't be denied forever. And in 2005, both men decided to strike out on their own. "It was about the toughest decision I ever made," recalls Mr. Stone, "and if I'd known how high Google stock would go, I'm not sure I would have made it."

Once out of Google, Mr. Williams teamed with another entrepreneur, Noah Glass, to found Odeo, a podcasting company. It was a brilliant plan, until Apple decided to offer its own podcasting application in iTunes. Says Biz, who had also joined the firm, "I remember asking Evan, 'Do you really want to be the King of Podcasting?' And he said, 'No.' And that was it." Looking back, Mr. Williams says, "I didn't follow my gut. I intellectualized myself into Odeo."

Mr. Williams had taken venture capital money to build Odeo and to change its business model, and he had to buy out those investors with a big chunk of his Blogger cash. Once again abandoning the main idea for a sidelight, he transformed Odeo into Twitter by stripping down and selling off the podcasting component and keeping the social-networking tool, the last a concept proposed by Jack Dorsey, now Twitter chairman.

Under the guise of a fun communications tool, Twitter is building one of the world's most valuable real-time information caches. And as Twitter's profile continues to explode, Oprah just sent her first tweet on yesterday's show, many wonder whether the company will ever find a revenue model.

Others speculate about who will buy the young company. Google seems to be the leading candidate. "We know there are a lot of people looking at Twitter right now," says Mr. Stone.

For now, Messrs. Williams and Stone are keeping their plans secret. With patient investors who just put in $35 million in third-round funding, the company is in no hurry. Mr. Stone will only say that "we are enamored with the idea of going all the way." Adds Mr. Williams: "We want to have as large an impact as possible."

Mr. Williams says that the amount of money it would take to buy Twitter right now is more than any company could justify to its shareholders, but suggests three other possible scenarios.

First, that Twitter could go public, probably without him, as he has little interest in running a public company. Second, Twitter could remain private and somehow buy out its investors. Or third, they discover some other option no one has thought of yet.

Of course, there's still one more possibility: Yet another one of Mr. Williams's obsessive distractions, as he calls them. Lately, he's been pondering a way to revolutionize email.

Source.

Filed under  //   Amazon.com   Biz Stone   Blogger.com   Christopher Isaac "Biz" Stone   eBay   Evan Williams   Google   Hewlett-Packard   Jack Dorsey   Jerry Brown   Meg Hourihan   NASA   Noah Glass   Obama   Odeo   Podcasting   Pyra   Santosh Jayaram   South by Southwest   Tweets   Twitter   US Airways Flight 1549   Venture Capital  

Comments [0]

Getting Energy Stimulus Money From the Government

Since Congress approved the $787 billion economic stimulus package in February 2009, venture investors have been eyeing the money earmarked for energy projects.

Lawyer Sylvia Burks, a partner at Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, has been monitoring the process of implementing those programs. Burks, who will be a panelist at the Dow Jones Alternative Energy Innovations conference April 21 and 22 in Redwood City, Calif., talked with VentureWire about how the money will be distributed.

How much of the $787 billion is actually set aside for energy programs? Is $65 billion about right?

I think that’s probably on the low side. You may see it up to $90 billion.

How much of it might be available to emerging companies?

That’s a much smaller amount. The whole intent behind the stimulus bill is to get companies up and running and to get employment up. Most of it is for later-stage companies that need to start manufacturing, to build solar farms or wind farms. For smaller companies I would say probably 10% of the total that’s set aside for green spending.

Has this started to generate some interest among venture-backed companies?

Absolutely. There is a tremendous amount of interest and a tremendous amount of lack of understanding as well. As I said, most of this money is used for companies that are later-stage. So for the nascent technology that’s looking for money for research and development, there is not as much of that.

Another thing is that some of these existing divisions, departments and regulatory agencies have been allotted money, but they have not yet gotten applications and procedures in place that would allow them to actually give the money out. A very good example is the ARPA-E, which is the advanced research project for energy. They don’t have a director in place yet much less any type of procedures for applying for that money.

When might these programs be up and running?

It’s 60 days for some, 90 days for some and with respect to some there’s no deadline. Everything we hear is that they are very, very understaffed and so it’s not happening as quickly as people would like. The conditional loan guarantee for Solyndra was the first big announcement of stimulus money having been allotted. The second one was the announcement on April 15, 2009, by Energy Secretary Steven Chu of the $41.9 million with respect to the fuel cells.

Are you optimistic that this money will get put out in a timely fashion?

I think everyone is a little bit circumspect about whether that will happen. I think there’s lots and lots of pressure for it to happen but then on the other hand there’s a lot of risk aversion, too, on the side of the regulators who are doing this.

The private sector is motivated by making money. The government doesn’t have that same incentive. Instead, I think, their incentive is risk avoidance. So if anything there is going to be too little risk taken.

Source.

Filed under  //   ARPA-E   Dow Jones Alternative Energy Innovations   Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP   Solyndra   Steven Chu   Stimulus Package   Sylvia Burks   Venture Capital  

Comments [0]